When Typhoons Tino and Uwan battered the Philippines in November 2025, they exposed more than swollen rivers and shattered dikes. They revealed a deeper and deadlier reality: in this country, the flood often begins not with rain, but with corruption. From 2022 to 2025, the government allotted ₱545 billion for flood control. Yet audits and Senate inquiries suggest that ghost projects, substandard construction, and contractor monopolies may have bled the economy of up to ₱118 billion. Some experts estimate that in certain projects, only 40% of the funds reach actual implementation—the rest disappears into a maze of kickbacks and political favors.
This scandal is not an accident. It is a system. Fifteen favored contractors cornered about ₱100 billion, roughly a fifth of all flood-control spending since 2022. These projects are technically complex, difficult to monitor, and perfect for quiet profit. The pork barrel was abolished in name—but survives in practice. Flood control has become the new political currency.
That is why the 2025 flood control scandal cannot be treated as a simple “abuse of funds.” In a country battered by 20 typhoons a year, the absence of flood protection is not mere inefficiency. It is slow, systemic violence—one that falls hardest on the poor, the riverside settlers, the jeepney drivers, and the farmers waiting for relief goods beside muddy roads.
The scandal also exploded at the worst political moment: amid the deepening split between President Marcos and the Duterte camp. Each side now exposes the other’s budget allocations with surgical precision—and both are correct. Allocations in Davao are questioned; allocations in Romualdez districts are likewise flagged. Where political alliances once protected projects, political feuds now expose them. But this “expose war” brings no reform—only paralysis. When everyone has something to hide, no one dares to clean house.
Public anger has surged. The November 2025 rally gathered an estimated 650,000 Filipinos—one of the largest public demonstrations in decades. They came from parishes, jeepney terminals, evacuation zones, and student dormitories. But the presence of well-organized bloc-voting groups—particularly Iglesia ni Cristo—added an ambiguous note. Was this the birth of a real movement for reform—or merely the rehearsal of another election war?
The administration responded with familiar moves: it cancelled ₱252 billion in 2026 flood-control projects, formed a commission, and promised accountability “before Christmas.” But history warns us to be cautious. The Philippines has seen this play before: PDAF, the Fertilizer Fund, Pharmally. Money vanishes. Public outrage rises. A few names are prosecuted. The system resets—and waits for the next budget cycle. In this structure, corruption is not aberration; it is strategy.
But there is a deeper danger now—scandal fatigue. As corruption becomes routine, outrage becomes brief. Our worst political illness is not plunder—it is exhaustion. If we accept that corruption is inevitable, we must also accept that death by flood is inevitable. Climate change will not wait. The next typhoon season will test not only our infrastructure—but our democracy’s pulse.
There is a boundary that must not be crossed: When the public stops caring, accountability vanishes. When accountability vanishes, disaster response becomes mere performance. When performance replaces governance—floods do not come from the sky; they originate from the system itself.
The waters from the 2025 typhoon have receded. But the real flood—the one running through our institutions—has not. It erodes the riverbanks of democracy, quietly and steadily, year after year. If we allow it to flow unchecked, there may come a day when disaster strikes—and we find that our democracy, too, has quietly drowned.
The question is not whether the next storms will come. They will.
The deeper question is: Will we have built defenses— or only better excuses?
No comments:
Post a Comment