The Lingua Franca We Dare Not Criticize: Why Tagalog Struggles as an Intellectual Language

For decades, government and academe in the Philippines have championed the cause of Filipino — often interchangeably called Tagalog — as the national and intellectual language. Billions of pesos have been spent on its promotion. Educational reforms have mandated its use. Institutions have held conferences, coined new words, and created elaborate glossaries. And yet, for all the ceremony and lip service, one fact remains stubbornly obvious: Filipino has not — and perhaps cannot — break through as a truly academic, global, or world-class intellectual language. Why?

Because, simply put, Tagalog is a cumbersome language for formal, intellectual, or technical use. Anyone who has had to write an academic paper or deliver a scientific lecture in Filipino knows this. The words are often long, mechanical, or awkwardly constructed. The syntax favors redundancy over precision. The coinages — many of them manufactured by committees rather than by natural linguistic evolution — feel clunky and artificial.

Take, for instance, the government-approved Filipino translation of “facilitator" or "moderator”: “tagapagdaloy.” A five-syllable tongue-twister that literally means “facilitator of flow.” (as in a conference or seminar).  No one uses it in real life unless required by a speech contest rubric. Or how about “salipawpaw” for “airplane” — a poetic but obscure word that only ever shows up in textbooks and bureaucratic signage, never in airport conversations. Even the everyday cellphone charger becomes “pantablay,” a coinage that sounds like an appliance brand, not a living word.

We can go on and on: website is "pook-sapot", email is "sulatroniko", mathematics is "sipnayan", dictionary is "talatinigan", web browser is "panginain", and microphone is "miktinig." These esoteric terms are the perfect symbols of why Filipino, despite its noble intentions, struggles to gain traction in real intellectual and cultural spaces.

In contrast, English—for all its colonial baggage—remains the language of science, law, medicine, international diplomacy, and even higher education in the Philippines. It allows for clarity, nuance, and brevity. It is the medium of instruction in our best universities, the default language of thesis writing, and the bridge to global knowledge. When Filipino is mandated for use in academic settings, what often happens is this: the speaker or writer thinks in English, outlines in English, and then translates awkwardly into Filipino — with mixed results. So why can’t we admit this?

Because doing so feels politically incorrect. Language is identity, nationalism, pride. To point out Filipino’s limitations is to risk being called unpatriotic, colonial-minded, or elitist. It is more comfortable—and safer—to pretend that the project of intelektwalisasyon ng wikang Filipino is succeeding, even when it is not. As a result, we continue the charade. We hold seminars in Filipino where the PowerPoint slides are written in English. We coin new terms that no one uses. We “develop” the language without really using it to develop ideas.

And still, Filipino has not emerged as a regional lingua franca (unlike Bahasa Indonesia or Malay), nor a literary powerhouse like Spanish, nor a diplomatic language like French. It remains largely confined to domestic entertainment, informal communication, and the echo chambers of state-funded institutions.

It is time to be honest. Filipino has not failed because it is inferior — but because the gap between its romanticized vision and its actual use has never been addressed. The language is weighed down by politics, artificial rules, and cultural insecurities. What it needs is not more tokenistic promotion, but genuine development — grounded in organic usage, literary excellence, and intellectual utility.

Until then, let us not vilify those who choose English as their tool of thought. They are not traitors to the Filipino soul. They are, more often than not, realists in a country that refuses to face linguistic truth. 

Policy Brief: Reevaluating Nuclear Power in the Philippines: A Step Toward Energy Security and Climate Resilience

Introduction

The Philippines currently faces significant challenges in its energy sector, including escalating fuel prices, grid instability, and the pressing need to address climate change. While the concept of nuclear energy has historically evoked apprehension among Filipinos, largely due to concerns surrounding the mothballed Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP), past corruption allegations, and foreign disasters like Fukushima, a reevaluation based on current facts and technological advancements is necessary. This paper argues for a reasoned and well-founded approach to integrate nuclear power into the nation's energy mix, emphasizing safety, transparency, and strategic implementation.

The apprehension surrounding nuclear energy in the Philippines is understandable, rooted in historical events and public perception. However, dismissing nuclear power outright based on past fears would be a missed opportunity to address the nation's critical energy needs and climate goals. Modern nuclear technology has evolved significantly, offering safer and more efficient solutions, such as Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). 

Indeed, many developed, industrialized, and reputable countries, such as South Korea, France, and Canada, already operate numerous safe and reliable nuclear power systems. Therefore, a fresh perspective, informed by scientific advancements and global best practices, is crucial to overcoming historical reservations and exploring atomic energy's potential as a stable, clean, and domestically generated power source for the Philippines.

1. Evolving Nuclear Technology and Safety Standards

The landscape of nuclear power has significantly advanced beyond the Cold War era. Modern atomic reactors incorporate passive safety systems designed to automatically shut down in the event of an emergency, thereby enhancing their safety profile. Furthermore, Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), currently under development globally, offer a more compact, manageable, and less risky alternative for nuclear energy generation. A contemporary understanding of these technological advancements is crucial for informed policy decisions.

These advancements directly address many of the historical anxieties associated with nuclear power, moving the industry towards inherently safer designs. The shift from large, complex plants to smaller, more modular units reduces both the capital investment and the potential for large-scale incidents. By recognizing and studying these innovations, policymakers can make decisions grounded in current engineering realities rather than outdated perceptions, paving the way for a more secure and sustainable energy future for the Philippines.

Given these transformative developments, the Philippines has a unique opportunity to leapfrog older technologies and embrace these advanced, safer, and more flexible nuclear solutions. This strategic embrace of modern atomic science, particularly SMRs, can allow the nation to harness reliable, clean energy without replicating the challenges associated with past projects, thereby building public confidence through tangible improvements in safety and efficiency.

2. Learning from the Past: The BNPP Experience

The Bataan Nuclear Power Plant serves as a cautionary tale, marked by poor timing, a controversial location, and allegations of overpricing. However, the lessons learned from this experience can inform future endeavors. Progress in nuclear energy development in the Philippines must prioritize transparency, expertise, and accountability to avoid past mistakes.

This historical context, while challenging, provides invaluable insights for any future nuclear energy project. It underscores the critical importance of robust regulatory frameworks, independent oversight, and clear public communication to build trust and prevent a recurrence of the issues that plagued the BNPP. By openly acknowledging and addressing the concerns from the past, the Philippines can establish a foundation for a nuclear program that is not only technologically advanced but also ethically sound and publicly supported.

Therefore, revisiting nuclear energy in the Philippines does not mean ignoring or repeating the BNPP's errors. Instead, it means actively learning from them to ensure that any new project is built on principles of integrity and public confidence. This commitment to learning from history, rather than being paralyzed by it, is fundamental to building a sustainable and trusted energy future for the nation.

3. Phased Implementation through Pilot Projects

A cautious and incremental approach to nuclear energy adoption is advisable. Initiating small, well-monitored nuclear projects in isolated areas with unreliable power supply can demonstrate the safety and efficiency of nuclear technology to the Filipino public. This "show, don't just tell" strategy can build public confidence and support.

This strategy directly addresses the historical apprehension by allowing Filipinos to witness firsthand the safe and efficient operation of modern nuclear facilities. By starting with smaller, more manageable projects, particularly in regions that have historically suffered from inconsistent power supply, the tangible benefits of stable, clean energy can become evident. This practical demonstration can foster a shift in public perception from fear to acceptance, transforming abstract concepts into concrete improvements in daily life and economic activity.

Furthermore, these pilot projects offer invaluable opportunities for local capacity building, training Filipino engineers, managers, and technicians in the operation and maintenance of advanced nuclear technologies. Collaborating with experienced international partners and managers in these initial stages would ensure adherence to the highest global safety standards and best practices, further bolstering trust and expertise within the country. France (Electricite de France), US (Constellation Energy), Canada (CANDU Reactor Technology), and South Korea (KEPCO) are often cited as leaders in nuclear energy management. This measured approach not only de-risks the initial investment but also creates a scalable model for future expansion, allowing the Philippines to strategically integrate nuclear power as a reliable component of its broader energy plan.

4. Depoliticizing Energy Decisions: The Role of Scientific Expertise

Energy policy decisions should be guided by scientific and economic expertise rather than political considerations. Engaging institutions such as the University of the Philippines or the National Academy of Science and Technology (NAST) can foster public trust by providing unbiased, fact-based information on nuclear energy.

The history of the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP) regrettably illustrates how energy policy in the Philippines has often become overly politicized. The narrative surrounding the BNPP was significantly shaped by various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and activist groups, who, while raising valid concerns, sometimes overshadowed expert technical assessments with emotionally charged arguments. This often led to a reactive stance from the government, making long-term strategic energy planning difficult amidst public outcry and political pressures, rather than allowing a measured, evidence-based discourse on the technology itself.

Moving forward, it is crucial to insulate energy planning, particularly concerning complex technologies like nuclear power, from such partisan debates. A science-led advisory body, free from political influence, would be essential in evaluating the feasibility, safety, and economic viability of nuclear options. By empowering institutions with verifiable expertise, the nation can ensure that decisions are made on objective data and expert consensus, thereby rebuilding public confidence and steering clear of the pitfalls of past politicized energy controversies.

5. Nuclear Energy for Climate Justice and Energy Independence

Beyond addressing energy shortages, nuclear power presents an opportunity for climate justice, particularly for underserved provinces that frequently experience power outages. It offers a path towards energy independence, reducing reliance on imported fossil fuels. When combined with renewable energy sources, nuclear power can contribute to community development and assist in achieving climate goals.

The concept of climate justice underscores that the burdens of climate change and energy poverty disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. In the Philippines, this often translates to remote or less developed provinces enduring consistent power outages, which hinders economic growth and basic quality of life. Nuclear power, with its consistent and high-output generation capacity, can provide the reliable base load electricity these areas desperately need, helping to bridge the energy gap and ensuring that development is equitable and sustainable across the archipelago. This stability can attract investments, foster local industries, and improve essential services, directly addressing the social dimension of climate justice.

Furthermore, leveraging nuclear energy significantly bolsters the Philippines' energy independence. Currently, the nation's heavy reliance on imported fossil fuels makes it susceptible to volatile global energy markets and geopolitical instabilities. By generating a substantial portion of its power domestically through nuclear means, the Philippines can achieve greater energy security, stabilize electricity prices, and reallocate resources previously spent on fuel imports towards national development initiatives. This strategic shift not only reduces the country's carbon footprint but also fortifies its economic resilience against external shocks, aligning energy policy with broader national security and environmental objectives.

6. Managing Nuclear Waste: A Solvable Challenge

Public perception often exaggerates the risks associated with nuclear waste. In reality, nuclear waste is small in volume, securely contained, and managed safely in numerous countries worldwide. The environmental impact of nuclear waste is considerably less than the continuous emissions from fossil fuel combustion, such as smoke, soot, and carbon.

The exaggerated fear surrounding nuclear waste frequently overshadows the stark reality of pollution from conventional energy sources. Unlike the dispersed and pervasive emissions from burning fossil fuels—which directly contribute to air pollution, respiratory illnesses, and climate change on a daily basis —nuclear waste is meticulously controlled and isolated. Its comparatively small volume allows for secure, long-term storage solutions that prevent environmental contamination, a stark contrast to the continuous, uncontained release of pollutants from coal and diesel power plants.

Furthermore, significant advancements are being made in nuclear waste management and recycling technologies, which aim to further reduce the volume and radiotoxicity of spent fuel. Countries with established nuclear programs have developed robust protocols for safe handling, transport, and disposal, often involving deep geological repositories or reprocessing facilities. These continuous innovations underscore that the "waste problem" is not an insurmountable barrier, but a manageable engineering challenge with proven solutions, especially when weighed against the intractable and far-reaching environmental damage caused by fossil fuel waste.

7. A Balanced Energy Mix for Resiliency

Nuclear energy should not be viewed as a standalone solution but as an integral component of a diverse and resilient energy portfolio. A combination of solar, wind, geothermal, hydro, and nuclear power can leverage the unique strengths of each source, with nuclear providing consistent power generation regardless of weather conditions or time of day.

This strategic diversification is paramount for achieving true energy security in the Philippines. While renewable sources like solar and wind are vital for decarbonization, their intermittent nature means they cannot provide constant, uninterrupted power. This variability often necessitates reliance on fossil fuel "peaker" plants to fill gaps, undermining climate goals. Nuclear power, conversely, offers a high-capacity, baseload generation that operates continuously, providing stability and reliability to the grid, thereby complementing renewables perfectly and reducing the need for polluting backup sources.

Integrating nuclear energy within such a balanced mix also enhances the overall resilience of the national power grid against various disruptions, including natural disasters and fluctuations in global energy markets. A diversified portfolio ensures that the failure or underperformance of one energy source does not lead to widespread blackouts or economic instability. By embracing a "mix-and-match" approach, the Philippines can build a robust, clean, and economically viable energy system that supports sustained development and ensures reliable power for all its citizens.

Conclusion: Cautious Boldness for a Sustainable Energy Future

While apprehension towards nuclear energy is understandable, fear alone should not dictate national policy. The Philippines must embrace "cautious boldness"—a strategy rooted in scientific understanding, informed by past experiences, and driven by the vision of a more secure and sustainable energy future. It is a strategy that takes calculated risks, but with careful consideration and awareness of potential dangers or consequences.

The nation stands at a critical juncture where conventional energy solutions are proving increasingly insufficient and environmentally damaging. To overcome ingrained fears and historical setbacks, a forward-looking approach is essential. This "cautious boldness" means moving beyond the paralysis induced by past controversies, particularly surrounding the BNPP, and instead, drawing concrete lessons to inform a new, transparent, and expert-driven path for energy development. It acknowledges public concerns but insists on grounding policy in rigorous data and expert consensus, not emotional responses.

Implementing this cautious boldness requires strong political will and unwavering commitment to long-term national interests over short-term political expediency. It means prioritizing comprehensive public education campaigns, fostering independent scientific oversight, and carefully selecting pilot projects that demonstrate the safety and benefits of modern nuclear technology. By taking these deliberate, well-planned steps, the Philippines can gradually build public trust and technical expertise, ensuring that any future nuclear energy deployment is undertaken with the highest standards of safety, environmental protection, and economic viability.

Ultimately, the choice facing the Philippines is whether to remain trapped by historical anxieties or to bravely pursue a diversified, resilient, and clean energy future. Embracing nuclear energy as a complementary component within a broader mix of renewables offers a powerful pathway to achieving energy independence, addressing climate change responsibilities, and ensuring reliable power for all Filipinos. This approach represents not a reckless leap, but a strategic and responsible progression towards a more secure and prosperous nation.

Policy Recommendations: 

To facilitate a prudent and effective integration of nuclear energy into the Philippines' energy strategy, the following policy recommendations are outlined:

1. National Education Campaign: Launch a comprehensive public education campaign utilizing schools, media, and town halls to demystify nuclear energy through clear and relatable language. This initiative is crucial for transforming public apprehension into informed understanding, laying the groundwork for broad societal acceptance. 

2. Empower Independent Experts: Establish a non-political, science-led advisory body to provide independent guidance and oversight for nuclear energy development. Such a body will ensure that decisions are based on objective data and expert consensus, free from political influence. 

3. Pursue Pilot Projects with Global Partners: Collaborate with countries experienced in nuclear technology, such as South Korea, the US, France, or Canada, to develop small-scale nuclear solutions in remote or underserved regions of the Philippines. These pilot projects will serve as tangible demonstrations of safety and efficacy, building trust through direct experience. 

4. Legislate Transparency and Accountability: Enact legislation to ensure that all nuclear energy projects are subject to rigorous public audits, community consultation, and international safety reviews. Robust legal frameworks are essential to diminish corruption, prevent past mistakes and guarantee public trust in the development and operation of nuclear facilities. 

5. Integrate Nuclear into a Broader Energy Plan: Position nuclear energy not as a singular solution, but as a robust and consistent element within a diversified, clean, and resilient national energy infrastructure. This balanced approach maximizes energy security and environmental sustainability, leveraging the unique strengths of each energy source. 

Sources: 

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2021). Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments 2020. IAEA. https://www.iaea.org/publications/13594/advances-in-small-modular-reactor-technology-developments

Lovering, J. R., Yip, A., & Nordhaus, T. (2016). Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors. Energy Policy, 91, 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.011

National Academy of Science and Technology Philippines (NAST). (2021). Science and technology-based governance in the energy sector. NAST Bulletin. https://nast.ph

OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. (2020). The costs of decarbonisation: System costs with high shares of nuclear and renewables. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_51111

Philippine Department of Energy. (2023). Philippine Energy Plan 2023–2050. https://www.doe.gov.ph/sites/default/files/pdf/pep/pep-2023-2050.pdf

Schneider, M., Froggatt, A., & Katsuta, T. (2023). The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2023. https://www.worldnuclearreport.org

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2015). The Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement

U.S. Department of Energy. (2021). Nuclear Energy: Clean, Reliable Power for the Future. Office of Nuclear Energy. https://www.energy.gov/ne/nuclear-energy-clean-reliable-power-future

World Nuclear Association. (2023). Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/small-nuclear-power-reactors.aspx

World Nuclear Association. (2023). Safety of Nuclear Power Reactors. https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/safety-of-nuclear-power-reactors.aspx

Bulakan Bulacan: A Small Town of Giants in Philippine History

Introduction

Bulakan, the historic town that lent its name to the province of Bulacan, is a cornerstone of the Philippine national narrative. Nestled near Manila Bay, the town's origins predate Spanish colonization. From a fishing and farming community governed by a native datu to a bastion of Catholicism, a crucible of the Revolution, and now a first-class municipality on the cusp of modern transformation, Bulakan’s trajectory reflects the richness and complexity of the Filipino experience.

Pre-Hispanic Roots and Cultural Flourishing

Archaeological evidence and historical records suggest that Bulakan thrived long before the Spanish arrival. The name “Bulakan” is believed to derive from "bulak" (cotton), which grew in abundance and was woven into fabric by locals using primitive looms. Pottery shards, agricultural tools, and foreign trade records dating back to as early as the 12th century paint a portrait of a community that engaged in vibrant economic and cultural exchanges.

Its coastal proximity allowed for active trade with Chinese and Malay merchants. Politically, it was ruled by local chieftains or datus, while religiously, animism prevailed with growing Islamic influence by the 1500s. Bulakeños joined Muslim forces during the 1571 Battle of Bangkusay to resist Spanish conquest, marking Bulakan's first recorded act of defiance against foreign invaders.

Spanish Colonization and the Rise of Catholicism

Following the Spanish conquest of Manila, Bulakan was officially founded in 1575 and became a full parish under the Augustinians by 1578. The town soon became the first capital of the newly created Province of Bulacan and the site of the oldest Roman Catholic church in the province, dedicated to "Nuestra Señora de la Asunción". Spanish friars praised Bulakan natives as among the most receptive to the faith. This laid the groundwork for enduring traditions such as the Flores de Mayo and the Dalit hymns, both believed to have originated in Bulakan.

Economically, Bulakan prospered. Its fields yielded rice and cotton, while rivers and fishponds supported vibrant aquaculture. Its strategic location made it a trading conduit to Manila. The town's elite gradually adopted Spanish customs, and Bulakan became renowned for its pottery, weaving, and artisanal crafts.

Still, resistance simmered. In 1583, Don Esteban Tasi of Bulakan joined the Magat Salamat conspiracy against Spanish rule. Later, during the British invasion of 1762, locals and Spanish forces briefly lost the town to Captain Slay's troops before guerrillas reclaimed it after nine days of fighting. These episodes etched patriotism deep into Bulakan's identity.

Revolutionary Cradle: The Enriquez Family and Beyond

The late 19th century witnessed the birth of Filipino nationalism. Bulakan contributed immensely through its sons: Marcelo H. del Pilar, the fiery journalist and reformist, and his nephew, General Gregorio del Pilar. Yet another family stood at the forefront of revolution – the Enriquez family of Barrio San Jose.

According to a well-documented family blog by yours truly, Vicente and Petrona Enriquez raised nine children, four of whom – Alfonso, Anacleto, Vicente Jr., and Jose – joined the Katipunan.

Anacleto, known as "Matanglawin," became a general and died heroically at the Battle of San Rafael in 1896. His death deeply moved his childhood friend, General del Pilar, who would later die at Tirad Pass. Vicente Jr. and Jose served under del Pilar's "Brigada Pilar" and survived that battle. 

The family’s women, including matriarch Petrona and daughter Victoria, were imprisoned by Spanish authorities. After the revolution, the brothers continued to serve the country in civil roles, including mayor, judge, and treasurer. Their story exemplifies how familial patriotism and sacrifice were essential to Bulakan's revolutionary fervor.

American Occupation and Cultural Resilience

Under American rule, Bulakan underwent administrative and educational transformations. The provincial capital moved to Malolos, but Bulakan remained a cultural stronghold. English-language public schools were established, and the Gabaldon school model took root.

Agriculture remained dominant, but infrastructure improvements like roads and irrigation helped boost the economy. Bulakan natives, including Senator Francisco "Soc" Rodrigo, first a broadcaster, then a senator,  emerged as national leaders. Catholicism retained its hold, though Protestantism gained a modest foothold. Public health, sanitation, and civil governance saw notable improvements.

Japanese Occupation and Guerrilla Valor

During World War II, Bulakan endured Japanese occupation marked by scarcity and fear. Yet, the town supported guerrilla movements, including the Bulacan Military Area under Alejo Santos. Dr. Vicente Lava, a native son, coordinated resistance as a key leader of the Communist Party and its military arm, the "Hukbo ng Bayan Laban sa Hapon" or "Hukbalahap".

Notably, the Lava brothers — Vicente, Jose, and Jesus Lava — hailed from Bulakan and became pillars of the communist movement in the Philippines. Their ideological influence, political organization, and underground leadership shaped the trajectory of the Philippine Left from much of the 1930s to the 1950s.

After Liberation in 1945, Bulakan resumed rebuilding and joined the Republic of the Philippines in celebrating full independence in 1946.

Post-War Growth and Contemporary Identity

In the decades following independence, Bulakan prospered as an agricultural center. Fishponds, rice fields, and coastal commerce defined its economy. The annual August fiesta in honor of the Virgin of the Assumption remained a high point of civic life.

The town preserved its heritage: ancestral houses, the colonial-era church, and historical shrines such as the Marcelo H. del Pilar Shrine in Barrio San Nicolas were maintained. A revival of traditions, such as Flores de Mayo and the Bangkaripas boat festivals in Barangay Tibig, emphasized cultural continuity.

Bulakan also made contributions to Philippine cinema. Dr. Jose Perez, the founder of Sampaguita Pictures, one of the most influential Filipino film studios during the mid-20th century, was a native of Bulakan. His studio helped launch the careers of many of the country’s beloved movie stars and contributed greatly to Filipino popular culture.

Notably, Bulakan continues to produce leaders of national stature. In 2025, Maria Theresa “Tess” Parreño Lazaro, a native of Bulakan, was appointed Secretary of Foreign Affairs of the Philippines, becoming the highest-ranking diplomat in the current BBM administration.

Bulakan in the 21st Century

Today, Bulakan is poised for transformation. The construction of the New Manila International Airport has positioned the town for economic uplift, but has also raised concerns over displacement and environmental degradation. The challenge lies in balancing growth with heritage conservation.

In 2020, the historic church was declared a Diocesan Shrine and the Marian image canonically crowned, reaffirming Bulakan’s religious legacy. Simultaneously, its people remain deeply connected to a past filled with courage, artistry, and resistance.

A Summary of Notable Personalities

Bulakan has produced a distinguished roster of individuals who have contributed to Philippine history, culture, and public service (in no particular order):

1. Marcelo H. del Pilar – Renowned propagandist and editor of La Solidaridad, he played a key role in the reform movement against Spanish colonial rule.

2. General Gregorio del Pilar – Nephew of Marcelo and one of the youngest generals of the Philippine Revolution, known for his heroic last stand at the Battle of Tirad Pass.

3. General Anacleto “Matanglawin” Enriquez – A fearless Katipunero who died at the Battle of San Rafael and inspired his friend, Gregorio del Pilar.

4. Vicente, Jose, and Jesus Lava – Influential leaders of the Philippine communist movement during the mid-20th century, all natives of Bulacan.

5. Dr. Horacio C. Lava --- a prominent mid-century Filipino economist who was Central Bank director of economic research, and author of early scholarly works on regional living standards. His efforts contributed to developing the institutional backbone of Philippine economic policymaking.

6. Dr. Jose Roxas “Doc” Perez– Founder of Sampaguita Pictures, which shaped mid-century Filipino cinema. Known as a master star maker, he guided the careers of icons like Gloria Romero, Susan Roces, and Amalia Fuentes, and led the studio through the golden age of Filipino cinema. A barangay in Bulakan is named after him.

7. Senator Francisco “Soc” Rodrigo – A statesman, poet, playwright, broadcaster, and constitutionalist who served in the post-war Philippine Senate (1955–1967). He courageously opposed Ferdinand Marcos and was imprisoned during Martial Law and later honored at the Bantayog ng mga Bayani for his resistance.

8. Rosauro “Boy” Leonardo, the 1963 Grand National Champion of Tawag ng Tanghalan.

9. Angelito "Lito" Anzures was a respected Filipino supporting actor from Bulakan, Bulacan. Born Angelito Castro Anzures in 1927, he built a solid film career across decades, appearing in titles like Ang Panday sequels and Dugo ng Pusakal. 

10. Maria Theresa “Tess” Parreño Lazaro – Hailing from Brgy. San Jose, she was appointed Secretary of Foreign Affairs in 2025, becoming the highest-ranking diplomat in the country.

11. Rachel Enriquez Fidelino -- Lawyer, Former Commissioner, Wage Commission, and civic leader.

12 Recaredo Villaroman Enriquez -- Former Dean of San Beda College

13. Vicente Enriquez -- "Ayudante" to Gen. Gregorio Del Pilar and Tirad Pass survivor

14. Bonifacio S.F. Enriquez -- Former "Justice of the Peace" of Polo (Valenzuela), Bocawe (Bocaue), and Bigaa (Balagtas). He was one of the biggest landlords in Bulacan. In 1976, Bonifacio Enriquez was named "The Oldest Living Atenean."

15. Jose S.F. Enriquez -- Second Lieutenant in the Katipunan and Tirad Pass survivor.

Conclusion

Bulakan’s history is a mirror of the Philippine saga – from indigenous culture to colonial submission, revolution, war, and nationhood. It is a story not just of places and dates, but of families like the Enriquezes, of heroes like del Pilar and del Pilar, and of everyday townsfolk who toiled, prayed, and fought for their future. 

As Bulakan marches into the modern age, it does so not with historical amnesia but with a keen sense of the soil from which it rose. Its legacy is etched not just in monuments but in the hearts of its people.

From its coastal trade routes that once hummed with galleons and bancas, to its magnificent baroque church that bore witness to centuries of faith and defiance, Bulakan has always been more than a quiet town. It was a crucible of ideas, where the ink of reformist writings mingled with the blood of revolution. The historical currents established here shaped not just minds but consciences, nurturing generations who would help shape the Filipino identity. In every stone and street in Bulakan, there lingers a whisper of the past—inviting the present to remember, and the future to build wisely.

References

Agoncillo, T. A. (1990). History of the Filipino people (8th ed.). Garotech Publishing.

Bautista, V. A. (1995). Local governance in the Philippines: A book of readings. Center for Local and Regional Governance.

Del Mundo, C. (2000). Bulacan: Lalawigan ng bayani at kasaysayan. National Historical Commission of the Philippines.

Lapeña, C. (2016, August 16). Canonical coronation of Our Lady of the Assumption. GMA News Online. https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/

National Historical Commission of the Philippines. (n.d.). Marcelo H. del Pilar National Shrine. https://nhcp.gov.ph

Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. (1946, July 4). Declaration of Philippine independence. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1946/07/04/independence/

Reyes, B. (2014, March 21). The Enriquez family of Bulacan, Bulacan. Beto Reyes Blogspot. https://beto-reyes.blogspot.com/2014/03/the-enriquez-family-of-bulacan-bulacan.html

Scott, W. H. (1994). Barangay: Sixteenth-century Philippine culture and society. Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Tolentino, R. B. (2001). Sampaguita Pictures: The glory days of Philippine cinema. University of the Philippines Press.

Tungol, N. (2012). The Lava legacy: The Communist Party of the Philippines in the 20th century. Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Wikipedia contributors. (2023). Bulakan, Bulacan. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulakan,_Bulacan

Wikipedia contributors. (2025). Tess Lazaro. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tess_Lazaro

Don’t Cut Senior High: It’s Our Youth’s Runway to the Future

In the Philippines today, many families are struggling. Food prices are rising, wages are stagnant, and sending children to school has become an ever-growing financial burden. It’s no wonder that some voices are calling for a rollback of the Senior High School (SHS) program, arguing that cutting Grades 11 and 12 would lessen costs and allow students to work and earn sooner.

It’s a tempting proposition. But it is also a dangerous one. For in trying to solve an immediate problem, we may be setting our children—and our country—up for a much deeper, long-term loss.

A Hard-Won Reform

The Senior High School program, part of the broader K to 12 reform introduced in 2013, was never a mere bureaucratic add-on. It was a strategic investment meant to align Philippine education with global standards, enhance the employability of young Filipinos, and give them real options: college, employment, or entrepreneurship. Those two additional years were designed not just to teach more content, but to deepen critical thinking, build technical skills, and instill maturity.

Prior to K to 12, the Philippines was one of the last countries in the world with a 10-year basic education cycle. Our graduates were often seen as underprepared abroad, whether for university or employment. We were shortchanging them—sending them into the world with fewer tools in an increasingly competitive global economy.

The Appeal of Shortening—and the Risks

The call to shorten high school often centers around cost. According to a 2018 study in Region XI, a public school SHS student spends about ₱27,000 annually on transportation, food, supplies, uniforms, and fees. For low-income families, especially those with multiple children, this is no small sum.

Would removing two years from the system ease this burden? Superficially, yes. It would mean earlier entry into the labor force and lower day-to-day expenses. But that relief comes at a steep price.

Shortening SHS would:

• Undermine academic and skills preparation for college and work;

• Reduce the employability of graduates in a knowledge-driven economy;

• Increase in drop-out rates in higher education due to unpreparedness;

• Devalue the academic standing of Filipino students in the global context;

• Reverse years of effort to raise our education system to international standards.

Imagine a nation where our young people are forced to grow up faster, with less education, fewer skills, and smaller chances for upward mobility. That’s the real cost of this proposal—and it’s one we must refuse to pay.

Global Evidence Points the Other Way

Around the world, countries are moving in the opposite direction—not shortening, but expanding education. Kenya’s 2017 competency-based reform extended basic education to 13 years. South Korea integrates science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) into its SHS system. In Ireland, students are given an optional transition year to mature and explore career paths. Even the U.S. continues to invest in four-year high school models that build both academic and career readiness.

Why? Because nations understand that human capital is their most valuable resource. The 21st century belongs to those who are educated, adaptive, and ready to lead in technology, innovation, and service. Slashing education at a time like this would not be pragmatic—it would be suicidal.

SHS Is Working—Quietly, But Powerfully

The evidence also shows that SHS is delivering. In 2023, SHS graduates with technical-vocational tracks posted employment rates of nearly 69%, and TESDA-trained students reached almost 80%. These are not empty statistics. They represent thousands of young Filipinos who, even without a college degree, were able to earn, support their families, and build careers.

Of course, the program is far from perfect. There are infrastructure gaps, overloaded teachers, and a need for more meaningful industry linkages. BUT THE ANSWER IS NOT TO DESTROY THE PROGRAM—IT IS TO FIX IT.

The Real Solution: Better Support, Not Less Education

Rather than cutting the number of years in school, we should be strengthening the support system around our students.

1. Expand financial aid and subsidies. SHS vouchers, food allowances, transportation support, and digital tools should be made more accessible, especially for students from marginalized communities.

2. Build stronger school-to-work pathways. TESDA-accredited tracks must be expanded and made more responsive to regional labor needs. Dual training, apprenticeships, and close coordination with local industries can bridge the classroom and the job market.

3. Make learning flexible. Modular, online, and evening classes can help working students continue their education. In rural and geographically isolated areas, alternative delivery modes must be scaled up.

4. Change the narrative. We must help families understand that SHS is not a burden, but a ladder. Through public information campaigns, success stories, and community engagement, we can restore trust and enthusiasm in the program.

A Moral and National Imperative

At its heart, this is more than a debate about curriculum. It is a test of our values. Are we willing to invest in the future of the Filipino youth, or will we sacrifice long-term gains for short-term savings?

Shortening high school may offer temporary financial relief, but it threatens to deepen cycles of poverty and limit the very mobility we claim to desire. The true burden lies not in the number of years in school but in the absence of equitable support that allows every child to finish those years with dignity and hope.

We are not being asked to make education longer. We are being called to make it stronger.

Conclusion: A Runway, Not a Roadblock

In a rapidly evolving world, where skills and knowledge are the new currency, a robust education system is our only defense—and our best offense. Senior High School, if fully supported and continuously improved, can be the launchpad that elevates millions of young Filipinos toward their dreams.

Let us not demolish that runway. Let us extend it. Reinforce it. Let us build a future where education opens doors, not closes them.

The Filipino youth deserve nothing less.

Because of a Flower: Love, Loss, and Redemption in Dahil sa Isang Bulaklak

In the grand tapestry of Philippine cinema, few films have etched as tender and haunting a legacy as Dahil sa Isang Bulaklak (1967), a sweeping melodrama directed by Luis Nepomuceno. With its rich symbolism, poignant performances, and exploration of the human cost of secrets and pride, the film remains a landmark not only for its artistic achievement—being the Philippines’ entry to the 1967 Academy Awards—but also for the emotional truths it unearths.

At the heart of the film lies a love story—tender, forbidden, and ultimately tragic—between Edilberto (Ric Rodrigo), a man of humble means, and Margarita (Charito Solis), a woman bound by the expectations of her wealthy haciendero family. Their love, like a delicate flower, bloomed in silence but was crushed under the weight of class prejudice and a wrongful accusation. Edilberto is unjustly blamed for the death of Margarita’s brother, an event that not only banishes him from her life but also erases the very existence of their love child, Esperanza.

That child, played by Liza Lorena in her screen debut, grows up unaware of her true identity. Her character, Esperanza, is the unknowing bearer of a secret long buried—a secret marked by a birthmark shaped like a flower. This small detail becomes the key that unlocks the tangled past. It is this “isang bulaklak,” both literal and symbolic, that rekindles long-extinguished truths, stirs memories best forgotten, and ultimately becomes the catalyst for the family’s confrontation, collapse, and healing.

Edilberto, throughout the narrative, emerges as the quiet moral center—a man who endures injustice without bitterness, and whose love remains steadfast even in exile. In contrast to the cold pride of the landowning elite, his character represents the dignity of the wronged and the redemptive power of patience. When the truth is finally revealed, he does not seek vengeance, but instead reclaims what was his with grace and sorrow. Margarita, too, is a tragic figure, torn between love and duty, between what is right and what is expected.

The film’s title, Dahil sa Isang Bulaklak, carries immense emotional weight. On one level, it refers to Esperanza’s birthmark—the physical evidence of a love that once defied convention. On a deeper level, the flower becomes a symbol of the fragility of relationships, the cost of silence, and the beauty of forgiveness. Because of a single flower, a family is broken—but also, because of that same flower, it is made whole again.

The narrative is ultimately one of redemption. Esperanza, once a symbol of shame, becomes the bridge of reconciliation. Her presence forces her parents to confront their past, accept their failings, and choose healing over bitterness. The flower, once a mark of sin and secrecy, is transformed into a symbol of truth and grace.

Dahil sa Isang Bulaklak reminds us that the smallest things—a word unspoken, a love denied, a birthmark in the shape of a flower—can carry the weight of generations. But it also teaches us that through courage, truth, and love, even the deepest wounds can heal. In its final moments, the film does not end with tragedy, but with hope—the kind that grows quietly, like a flower pushing through the cracks of sorrow.

The Trillion-Dollar Blueprint: Inside Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill"

The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," colloquially known as "Trump's Big Beautiful Bill," is a comprehensive piece of legislation that recently secured passage in the Senate and is now under consideration by the House of Representatives. This sprawling bill addresses many policy priorities, primarily focusing on tax reform, border security, and modifications to social safety net programs (AP News, 2025a).

Here's a look at its key provisions and their potential implications:

1. Tax Cuts and Economic Stimulus:

At the core of the "One Big Beautiful Bill" are significant tax cuts, which proponents argue will catalyze economic growth (White House, 2025b). A central element is the permanent extension of most of the individual and business tax cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, provisions that are otherwise slated to expire at the close of 2025 (AP News, 2025a). This permanence is deemed crucial to avert a substantial tax increase for many Americans (AP News, 2025a).

Building on existing cuts, the bill introduces new tax breaks consistent with Donald Trump's 2024 campaign pledges. These include the elimination of federal income taxes on tips and overtime pay, and a provision allowing for the deduction of interest paid on loans for cars manufactured in the U.S. (AP News, 2025a; Holland & Knight, 2025). Additionally, it establishes a new $6,000 deduction for older adults earning up to $75,000 annually (AP News, 2025a; Economic Times, 2025).

The Child Tax Credit would see an increase from $2,000 to $2,200 per child (AP News, 2025a). For high-tax states, the bill temporarily quadruples the cap on the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction from $10,000 to $40,000 for five years, a compromise from the House's initial proposal for a 10-year extension (AP News, 2025a; Economic Times, 2025).

The legislation also includes numerous business-related tax cuts, such as allowing businesses to immediately write off 100% of the cost of equipment and research, and an increase in the small business tax deduction from 20% to 23% (Holland & Knight, 2025; White House, 2025a). The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis of the House's version indicated that the wealthiest households would see a $12,000 increase, while the poorest individuals would experience a cost of $1,600 per year (AP News, 2025a, 2025c). Middle-income taxpayers, however, could see a tax break ranging from $500 to $1,500 (AP News, 2025a). In total, the legislation contains about $4.5 trillion in tax cuts over 10 years (AP News, 2025c).

2. Border Security and Immigration Enforcement:

A significant portion of the "One Big Beautiful Bill" is dedicated to strengthening border security and enhancing immigration enforcement (White House, 2025b). It allocates substantial funds, approximately $350 billion over four years, for border and national security (AP News, 2025c). This includes roughly $46.5 billion specifically for the construction, installation, or improvement of physical barriers along the southern and northern borders, along with associated infrastructure like access roads, cameras, lights, and sensors (Al Jazeera, 2025b; Immigration Forum, 2025; Times of India, 2025a).

The bill provides $4.1 billion to hire and train 3,000 new Border Patrol agents and 5,000 new Office of Field Operations (OFO) customs officers, complemented by $2 billion in retention and hiring bonuses (Immigration Forum, 2025). Furthermore, it dedicates $75 billion over four years to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), aiming to significantly expand interior enforcement operations and supporting plans for up to one million annual deportations (Immigration Forum, 2025). The legislation also introduces new fees on immigrants, including a $100 annual fee for those seeking asylum while their applications are pending, and a $1,000 fee for individuals paroled into the U.S. (House Judiciary Committee Republicans, 2025; Wikipedia, 2025).

3. Social Safety Net Reforms:

The bill proposes substantial changes to social safety net programs, primarily through cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) (AP News, 2025c). For the first time, it imposes new work requirements for certain able-bodied adults receiving Medicaid, mandating that individuals aged 19 to 64 work at least 80 hours per month (Wikipedia, 2025). Existing work requirements in SNAP would also be expanded to apply to a broader range of beneficiaries (AP News, 2025c). Additionally, states would be required to cover a greater share of food benefit costs, linked to their payment error rates (AP News, 2025c). The American Progress Center estimates these SNAP cuts could impact millions of children by affecting free school meal programs (American Progress, 2025).

To mitigate some concerns about the impact on rural healthcare, the bill includes a $50 billion Rural Hospital Fund to provide a stabilization fund against Medicaid cuts (CBS News, 2025; Wikipedia, 2025). The bill also mandates a five-year waiting period for green card holders before they can apply for Medicaid and reduces retroactive Medicaid payments from three months to one month (Wikipedia, 2025). Critics argue these changes could lead to millions losing healthcare coverage and place significant financial strain on families (Georgetown Center for Children and Families, 2025; KFF, 2025; Medical Economics, 2025).

4. Energy Policy and Other Provisions:

The "One Big Beautiful Bill" also addresses energy policy by rolling back billions in tax credits for green energy established under the Biden administration's Inflation Reduction Act (AP News, 2025b; Council on Foreign Relations, 2025; Kleinman Center for Energy Policy, 2025). These changes are more aggressive than previous proposals and could significantly impact investment in wind, solar, and other renewable energy projects, potentially jeopardizing hundreds of gigawatts of new power supply (AP News, 2025b). The bill aims to "usher in a new era of energy dominance by unlocking opportunities for investment, opening lease sales and expanding access to oil and natural gas development" (White House, 2025b). The bill includes a measure to postpone fees on methane emissions for 10 years, while extending tax credits for biofuels for an additional four years until 2031 (Wikipedia, 2025).

Furthermore, the bill includes a $5 trillion increase to the national debt ceiling, representing the largest increase in U.S. history (CBS News, 2025; Colorado Public Radio, 2025). Other provisions include funding for shipbuilding, munitions systems, quality of life measures for servicemen and women, and $25 billion for a "Golden Dome" missile defense system (Economic Times, 2025).

Potential Impacts and Current Status:

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that the Senate's version of the bill would add approximately $3.3 trillion to federal deficits over the next decade (AP News, 2025c; Times of India, 2025b). The CBO also projects that the legislation could result in 11.8 million more Americans becoming uninsured by 2034 (AHA News, 2025; Economic Times, 2025; Times of India, 2025b). Some analyses warn of potential fatalities from the Medicaid cuts, with one study projecting over 51,000 additional deaths each year (Times of India, 2025b).

Supporters of the bill contend it will stimulate economic growth, create jobs, and benefit families and workers by making historic tax relief permanent (White House, 2025b). They argue the tax cuts are essential to prevent a massive tax increase at year-end (AP News, 2025a). Conversely, critics assert that the legislation disproportionately benefits wealthy individuals and corporations while enacting substantial cuts to vital programs for vulnerable populations (Al Jazeera, 2025a; Times of India, 2025a). The bill has faced criticism and even dissent from within the Republican Party due to concerns about spending cuts and debt (Times of India, 2025b).

The Senate passed the bill on July 1, 2025, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote (AP News, 2025a; Times of India, 2025b). The House of Representatives had passed an earlier version in May and is now expected to consider the Senate-amended measure (AP News, 2025a). The Trump administration is pushing for the legislation to be signed into law before the U.S. Independence Day celebrations on July 4th (Al Jazeera, 2025a; Times of India, 2025a).

References

AHA News. (2025, July 1). Senate passes One Big Beautiful Bill Act. American Hospital Association. Retrieved from https://www.aha.org/news/headline/2025-07-01-senate-passes-one-big-beautiful-bill-act

Al Jazeera. (2025a, July 1). US Senate passes Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill', sending it to the House. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/1/senate-passes-trumps-one-big-beautiful-bill-sending-it-to-house

Al Jazeera. (2025b, July 2). Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' passes Senate: What's in it, who voted how? Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/2/trumps-big-beautiful-bill-passes-senate-whats-in-it-who-voted-how

American Progress. (2025, June 20). The One Big Beautiful Bill Act Would Gut Programs That Support Children. Retrieved from https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-one-big-beautiful-bill-act-would-gut-programs-that-support-children/

AP News. (2025a, July 2). What's in the latest version of Trump's big bill that passed the Senate. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/inside-trump-republican-spending-bill-provisions-details-06eb10bad4fd2a7ea2ac236e6535e61d

AP News. (2025b, July 1). Senate GOP tax bill could crush wind and solar power, advocates say. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/senate-clean-energy-tax-credits-trump-87f7ac850247f8a183d7c7933645b331

AP News. (2025c, July 2). House Republicans race toward a final vote on Trump's tax bill, daring critics to oppose. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/big-beautiful-bill-trump-tax-cuts-3b525482be43fdf956366cebd84dcaac

CBS News. (2025, July 2). Here's what's in Trump's "big, beautiful bill" that passed the Senate. Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/whats-in-trump-big-beautiful-bill-senate-version/

Colorado Public Radio. (2025, July 1). Senate passes One Big Beautiful Bill, getting the GOP's policy agenda one step closer to Trump's desk. Retrieved from https://www.cpr.org/2025/07/01/senate-passes-trumps-big-beautiful-bill/

Council on Foreign Relations. (2025, June 30). What Congress' 'Big' Policy Bill Means for Global Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/article/what-congress-big-policy-bill-means-global-climate-change

Economic Times. (2025, July 2). Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill unveiled: Tax cuts, mass deportations, child credit and more. Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/global-trends/us-news-us-senate-narrowly-passes-trumps-big-beautiful-bill-unveiled-tax-cuts-mass-deportations-child-credit-and-more/articleshow/122188953.cms

Georgetown Center for Children and Families. (2025, June 6). The One Big, Beautiful Bill Act will Mean Big Budget Hits for Families. Retrieved from https://ccf.georgetown.edu/2025/06/06/the-one-big-beautiful-bill-act-will-mean-big-budget-hits-for-families/

Holland & Knight. (2025, July 1). Senate GOP Passes Sweeping One Big Beautiful Bill Act | Insights. Retrieved from https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2025/07/senate-gop-passes-sweeping-one-big-beautiful-bill-act

House Judiciary Committee Republicans. (2025, May 19). Big Beautiful Border Security! Retrieved from https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/big-beautiful-border-security

Immigration Forum. (2025, May 29). One Big Beautiful Bill Act: Immigration Provisions. Retrieved from https://immigrationforum.org/article/one-big-beautiful-bill-act-immigration-provisions/

KFF. (2025, July 1). About 17 million more people could be uninsured due to the Big Beautiful Bill and other policy changes. Retrieved from https://www.kff.org/quick-take/about-17-million-more-people-could-be-uninsured-due-to-the-big-beautiful-bill-and-other-policy-changes/

Kleinman Center for Energy Policy. (2025, June 17). How the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Threatens America's Clean Energy Future. Retrieved from https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/commentary/blog/how-the-one-big-beautiful-bill-threatens-americas-clean-energy-future/

Medical Economics. (2025, July 1). One Big Beautiful Bill Act — physicians warn of effects on health care. Retrieved from https://www.medicaleconomics.com/view/one-big-beautiful-bill-act-physicians-warn-of-effects-on-health-care

Times of India. (2025a, June 26). Trump's 'big, beautiful bill': How US president could change America's immigration system - the wall, ICE & more. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/trumps-big-beautiful-bill-how-us-president-could-change-americas-immigration-system-the-wall-ice-more/articleshow/122082887.cms

Times of India. (2025b, July 2). 'Big, Beautiful Bill': Watch moment when Trump learnt of 51–50 Senate win; ‘thank you, wow!’. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/big-beautiful-bill-watch-moment-when-trump-learnt-of-5150-senate-win-thank-you-wow/articleshow/122188366.cms

White House. (2025a, May 22). WHAT THEY ARE SAYING: One, Big, Beautiful Bill Clears House. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/05/what-they-are-saying-one-big-beautiful-bill-clears-house/

White House. (2025b, July 1). WHAT THEY ARE SAYING: Senate Approves Landmark One Big Beautiful Bill. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/07/what-they-are-saying-senate-approves-landmark-one-big-beautiful-bill/

Wikipedia. (2025, July 2). One Big Beautiful Bill Act. In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Big_Beautiful_Bill_Act