China's assertive strategies in Southeast Asia, particularly directed at Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines, mark a significant shift in the region's power dynamics. These strategies include economic investments, military presence, and political alliances to enhance China's influence and reshape the regional order in its favor.
This essay will analyze the recent maneuvers and their implications for Philippine policy in the South China Sea. The area in question falls within its exclusive economic zone (EEZ), which extends 370 kilometers from its coast. Additionally, this essay will explore the potential re-establishment of the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO).
Economic Investments and Dependencies
China's economic investments in Southeast Asia, particularly in Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines, are a strategic tool to cultivate dependence and expand its influence. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is crucial to this strategy, providing infrastructure development and economic growth in exchange for political and strategic influence (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2023).
These investments often come with conditions. Countries that receive Chinese funds may find themselves in a "debt trap," where their financial obligations compromise their policy autonomy. For example, Chinese-funded projects in the Philippines, such as the New Centennial Water Source-Kaliwa Dam project and other infrastructure initiatives under the Duterte administration's "Build Build Build" program, have raised concerns about over-reliance on Chinese technology and capital (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2023).
Military Brazenness in the South China Sea
The military actions conducted by China in the South China Sea indicate its desire to assert control over this crucial maritime region. Through the construction and militarization of artificial islands, China seeks to exert influence and safeguard its strategic concerns. This buildup poses a direct threat to the territorial sovereignty and maritime rights of Vietnam, Indonesia, and particularly the Philippines (Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2019).
The South China Sea is of global importance for trade, fishing, and potential underwater resources. China's recent assertiveness in this area, most notably its construction of artificial islands, has been seen by the countries in the area as undermining international norms such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which these countries support (Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2019).
The Philippines has experienced increased Chinese presence and activities within its exclusive economic zone (EEZ), leading to tensions and conflicts. For example, the presence of Chinese vessels in the Reed Bank, Scarborough Shoal, and Pag-asa Island areas has heightened tensions.
These actions challenge the Philippines' ability to exploit maritime resources and maintain territorial integrity. The Philippine government's approach to addressing these challenges has involved a combination of diplomatic engagement, legal measures, and strengthening military capabilities to protect its interests (Council on Foreign Relations, 2023).
Political Alliances and Regional Influence
China's diplomatic efforts to build political alliances within Southeast Asia promote its regional ambitions. By offering economic incentives and engaging in high-level diplomacy, China seeks to align Southeast Asian countries with its strategic objectives. This approach poses a dilemma for Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines, which must balance their relations with China against their sovereignty and regional stability (Brookings Institution, 2019). China's influence can lead to a fragmentation of ASEAN unity, making it harder for Southeast Asian nations to present a united front on critical issues (Brookings Institution, 2019).
Political alliances are crucial for the Philippines in navigating the region’s complex dynamics. Engaging with other ASEAN members and major powers such as the United States, Japan, and Australia is vital for counterbalancing China's influence. The Philippines' diplomatic efforts, including bilateral talks and participation in multilateral forums, aim to strengthen its position and garner support from the international community.
Implications for Philippine Policy on the West Philippine Sea
China's actions in the South China Sea, often referred to as the West Philippine Sea in Philippine media, directly impact Philippine national security and sovereignty. Accordingly, the Philippines has taken various measures to address these challenges. The Permanent Court of Arbitration's 2016 decision invalidated China's broad claims in the South China Sea, and remains a cornerstone of the Philippines' legal strategy. Although China has rejected the ruling, the Philippines continues to invoke it in diplomatic engagements and seeks international support to uphold the rule of law (Council on Foreign Relations, 2023).
In addition to legal measures, the Philippines has been enhancing its military capabilities. Modernization efforts include acquiring new naval and air assets, which include two guided missile corvettes and at least 40 multirole fighter aircraft, improving surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities, and conducting joint military exercises with allies. These initiatives aim to bolster the country's ability to defend its maritime interests and deter aggression.
China’s Geopolitical Moves and the Need for a SEATO-Like Alliance in the Region
China's recent geopolitical actions have received widespread notice, particularly in the Asia-Pacific area. The country's forceful activities in the South China Sea, the BRI, and military modernization efforts all point to a strategic purpose to extend its influence (IISS, 2023).
The creation of artificial islands and the militarization of existing features in the South China Sea act as power projections, undermining international maritime rules and regional stability. (IISS, 2023).
China's ascent as a global force has caused surrounding nations to reconsider their security and economic plans. Many Southeast Asian countries profit economically from trade with China but are frightened of its growing influence and territorial ambitions. This duality results in a delicate balance between economic cooperation and security concerns.
Countries such as Vietnam and the Philippines have been especially vociferous about their territorial disputes with China, seeking backing from international organizations and other states to counterbalance China's dominant position.
Given these dynamics, the proposal of building a new security alliance similar to the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) has received support among countries in the region. SEATO was formed on September 8, 1954, with the United States, France, Great Britain, New Zealand, Australia, the Philippines, Thailand and Pakistan as original members. It aimed to combat communism in Southeast Asia. When the Vietnam War ended in 1975, the primary rationale for SEATO's existence vanished. As a consequence, SEATO was officially disbanded in 1977.
However, the SEATO as an idea has remained relevant. A new SEATO-style alliance might offer a collective security framework to counter the current dangers presented by China's aggression. Such an alliance would improve military cooperation and promote political and economic unity among member countries (East Asia Forum, 2023).
The viability of a new SEATO-like coalition would be dependent on the involvement and commitment of important regional parties. The US, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and India, together with ASEAN members, might form the foundation of this alliance. Their combined military capabilities, economic might, and diplomatic influence would be critical in deterring aggression and upholding a rules-based order in the area. This alliance might also participate in coordinated military exercises, information sharing, and strategic discussions to develop a strong security infrastructure.
Should the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) Be Reestablished?
Given the current geopolitical challenges posed by China's assertiveness, the re-establishment of SEATO could be considered as a strategy to enhance regional security. However several factors must be evaluated:
1. Relevance and Adaptability. SEATO was created in a different geopolitical context. A reestablished SEATO would need to address contemporary security threats, including cyber warfare, maritime security, and economic coercion. Updating its mandate to reflect current and emerging threats would be essential to ensure its effectiveness and relevance in today's strategic environment.
2. Inclusivity and Cooperation. Unlike the original SEATO, which was heavily influenced by Western powers, a new SEATO should prioritize regional leadership and inclusivity. Engaging all ASEAN members and other key regional players like Japan, Australia, and India would be crucial. This approach would ensure broader regional buy-in and collective ownership of security initiatives, fostering stronger regional solidarity.
3. Diplomatic Balance. Reestablishing SEATO could be perceived by China as a provocative move, potentially escalating tensions. A balanced approach that combines defense preparedness with diplomatic engagement would be necessary. By maintaining open channels of communication with China and emphasizing the defensive nature of the alliance, regional stability can be promoted while mitigating the risk of further escalation.
4. Institutional Strengthening instead of SEATO. Strengthening existing regional institutions like ASEAN might be a more pragmatic approach. Enhancing ASEAN's capacity to address security challenges collectively could achieve similar objectives without the complexities of creating a new treaty organization (East Asia Forum, 2023). Building on existing frameworks and mechanisms would leverage established trust and cooperation, streamlining efforts to bolster regional security.
5. The Role of the US. If SEATO were re-established, the United States would most certainly take the lead, providing military support, economic aid, and diplomatic engagement to promote regional peace and security. The United States would prioritize counterterrorism, disaster aid, and strategic relationships while pressing for free trade and economic integration. Balancing relations with China, navigating regional politics, securing financing, and maintaining public and political backing would all pose significant challenges. Very likely, the United States would take a comprehensive approach, utilizing SEATO to enhance cooperation while discouraging aggression in Southeast Asia.
These considerations highlight the complexity and strategic calculus involved in potentially reestablishing SEATO or any similar security alliance. Balancing modern security needs with diplomatic sensitivities and regional cooperation will be key to addressing the multifaceted challenges in the Asia-Pacific region.
Policy Recommendations
1. Strengthening Regional Cooperation: Southeast Asian countries should enhance cooperation through ASEAN to present a unified stance on issues of regional security and sovereignty. Joint statements and coordinated actions can counterbalance China's influence. This unified front will not only showcase solidarity but also ensure that smaller nations are not isolated in their disputes with China.
2. Diversifying Economic Partnerships : To reduce economic dependence on China, Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines should diversify their economic partnerships. Engaging with countries like Japan, South Korea, the United States, and the European Union can provide alternative sources of investment and trade. These diversified partnerships will offer more balanced economic growth and reduce vulnerability to economic coercion.
3. Enhancing Military Capabilities: Investing in military modernization and strengthening maritime security capabilities will enable Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines to better defend their territorial waters and airspace. Joint military exercises with other regional powers can also enhance their defensive posture. Developing indigenous defense industries and seeking advanced technologies through partnerships can further bolster their military strength.
4. Promoting Rule-Based Order: Advocating for adherence to international law, particularly UNCLOS, is crucial. Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines should continue to engage in multilateral forums to promote a rules-based order and seek international support against unilateral actions that threaten regional stability. Consistent diplomatic efforts and legal actions will reinforce the importance of international norms and legal frameworks.
5. Leveraging Diplomatic Channels: Diplomatic engagement with China should continue, emphasizing dialogue and negotiation to resolve disputes peacefully. Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines should also strengthen their diplomatic ties with other major powers to balance China's influence. Diplomatic efforts should include confidence-building measures and crisis management mechanisms to reduce the risk of conflict (Council on Foreign Relations, 2023).
6. Persisting in Legal Measures: The Philippines should persist in pursuing legal avenues such as the 2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration ruling to assert its rights in the West Philippine Sea and seek international support to uphold the rule of law. Legal diplomacy combined with robust public diplomacy campaigns can build global consensus and pressure China to comply with international rulings (Council on Foreign Relations, 2023).
7. Exploring SEATO Reestablishment: Policymakers should explore the feasibility and strategic implications of reestablishing SEATO. This exploration should involve a comprehensive assessment of contemporary security needs, regional geopolitical dynamics, and the potential for cooperation among Southeast Asian nations and their allies. Such an alliance could offer a structured platform for collective defense, intelligence sharing, and coordinated policy responses to security threats (East Asia Forum, 2023).
Conclusion
China's geopolitical maneuvers in Southeast Asia pose significant challenges for Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines. By combining economic investments, military assertiveness, and political alliances, China aims to reshape the regional order. To counter these challenges, these countries must pursue a multifaceted strategy that includes strengthening regional cooperation, diversifying economic partnerships, enhancing military capabilities, promoting a rule-based order, leveraging diplomatic channels, utilizing legal measures, and exploring the potential re-establishment of SEATO. Through these measures, they can safeguard their sovereignty and contribute to regional stability in Southeast Asia.
References
Brookings Institution. (2019). China’s Influence in Southeast Asia: Implications for the Region’s Future. Retrieved from [https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/FP_20191119_china_se_asia_stromseth.pdf](https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/FP_20191119_china_se_asia_stromseth.pdf)
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (2023). How Has China’s Belt and Road Initiative Impacted Southeast Asian Countries? Retrieved from [https://carnegieendowment.org](https://carnegieendowment.org)
Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2019). China’s Maritime Silk Road: Strategic and Economic Implications for the Indo-Pacific Region. Retrieved from [https://www.csis.org](https://www.csis.org)
Council on Foreign Relations. (2023). China’s Massive Belt and Road Initiative. Retrieved from [https://www.cfr.org](https://www.cfr.org)
East Asia Forum. (2023). China’s Complex Presence in Southeast Asia. Retrieved from [https://www.eastasiaforum.org](https://www.eastasiaforum.org)
IISS. (2023). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Geopolitical and Geo-economic Assessment. Retrieved from [https://www.iiss.org](https://www.iiss.org)
IISS. (2023). APRSA 2023 | Chapter 4: China’s Belt and Road Initiative a Decade On. Retrieved from [https://www.iiss.org/publications/strategic-dossiers/asia-pacific-regional-security-assessment-2023/aprsa-chapter-4/](https://www.iiss.org/publications/strategic-dossiers/asia-pacific-regional-security-assessment-2023/aprsa-chapter-4/)
